Using Software Maintainability Models to Track Code Health , D. Ash and J. Alderete and P.W. Oman and B. Lowther
@InProceedings{ ash.alderete.ea:using,
author = { D. Ash and J. Alderete and P.W. Oman and B. Lowther },
title = { Using Software Maintainability Models to Track Code
Health },
booktitle = { Proceedings of the International Conference on Software
Maintenance (ICSM~'94), {\rm (Victoria, B.C.; Sept. 19-23,
1994)}},
year = { September 1994 },
editor = { Hausi A. M\"{u}ller and Mari Georges },
pages = { 154-160 },
abstract = { },
class = {Alteration, Maintainability }
}
Little languages: Little maintenance, Deursen, A. van and P. Klint
Available as
domain.pdf.
@Article{ deursen.klint:little,
author = {Deursen, A. van and P. Klint},
title = {Little languages: Little maintenance},
journal = {Journal of Software Maintenance},
year = {1998},
volume = {10},
pages = {75--92},
url = {http://www.cwi.nl/~arie/papers/domain.pdf},
abstract = {So-called little,or domain-specific languages (DSLs), have
the potential to make software maintenance simpler:
domain-experts can directly use the DSL to make required
routine modifications. On the negative side, however, more
substantial changes may become more difficult: such changes
may involve altering the domain-specific language. This
will require compiler technology knowledge, which not every
commercial enterprise has easily available. Based on
experience taken from industrial practice, we discuss the
role of DSLs in software maintenance, the dangers
introduced by using them, and techniques for controlling
the risks involved.},
keywords = {Domain-specific language;, software maintenance; interest
rate products; language},
class = {Alteration Maintainability }
}