References of Module_Cohesion

    Quantifying software designs, J. Beane and N. Giddings and J. Silverman
    @InProceedings{	  beane.giddings.ea:quantifying,
      author	= {J. Beane and N. Giddings and J. Silverman},
      title		= {Quantifying software designs},
      pages		= {314--323},
      booktitle	= {Proceedings of the 7th  International Conference on
    		  Software Engineering },
      year		= {1984},
      publisher	= {IEEE Computer Society Press},
      month		= mar,
      class		= {Software_Reverse_Engineering, Reverse_Design,
    		  Metric-Based_Methods_in_Reverse_Design, Metrics,
    		  Module_Cohesion}
    }
    
    
    Assessing Software Maintainability at the end of High-Level Design, L. Briand and S. Morasca and V. Basili
    @InProceedings{	  briand.morasca.ea:assessing,
      author	= {L. Briand and S. Morasca and V. Basili},
      title		= {"Assessing Software Maintainability at the end of
    		  High-Level Design"},
      booktitle	= {Proceedings of the  International Conference on Software
    		  Maintenance ~1993},
      year		= {1993},
      month		= sep,
      class		= {Software_Reverse_Engineering, Reverse_Design,
    		  Metric-Based_Methods_in_Reverse_Design, Metrics,
    		  Module_Cohesion}
    }
    
    
    A Discriminant Metric for Module Cohesion, T. Emerson
    @InProceedings{	  emerson:discriminant,
      author	= {T. Emerson},
      title		= {A Discriminant Metric for Module Cohesion},
      year		= {1984},
      publisher	= {IEEE Computer Society Press},
      month		= mar,
      class		= {Software_Reverse_Engineering, Reverse_Design,
    		  Metric-Based_Methods_in_Reverse_Design, Metrics,
    		  Module_Cohesion}
    }
    
    
    Rule-based approach to computing module cohesion, Arun Lakhotia
    @InProceedings{	  lakhotia:rule-based,
      author	= {Arun Lakhotia},
      title		= {Rule-based approach to computing module cohesion},
      pages		= {35--44},
      booktitle	= {Proceedings of the 15th  International Conference on
    		  Software Engineering },
      year		= {1993},
      publisher	= {IEEE Computer Society Press},
      month		= apr,
      abstract	= {Stevens, Myers, and Constantine introduced the notion of
    		  cohesion, an ordinal scale of seven levels that describes
    		  the degree to which the actions performed by a module
    		  contribute to a unified function. The provided rules,
    		  termed as 'associative principles' to examine the
    		  relationships between 'processing elements' of a module and
    		  designate a cohesion level to it. Stevens et. al., however,
    		  did not give a precise definition for the term 'processing
    		  element', thereby leaving it open for interpretations.
    		  
    		  This paper interprets the 'output variables' (not
    		  statements) of a module as its processing elements. Stevens
    		  et. al.'s associative principles are transformed to relate
    		  the output variables based on their 'data' and 'control
    		  dependence' relationships. What results is a rule-based
    		  approach to computing cohesion. Experimental results show
    		  that, but for temporal cohesion, the cohesion associated to
    		  a module under our reinterpretation and that due to the
    		  original definitions are identical for all examples.},
      class		= {Software_Reverse_Engineering, Reverse_Design,
    		  Metric-Based_Methods_in_Reverse_Design, Metrics,
    		  Module_Cohesion}
    }
    
    
    Effects of Software Changes on Module Cohesion, Linda M. Ott and James M. Bieman
    @InProceedings{	  ott.bieman:effects,
      author	= {Linda M. Ott and James M. Bieman},
      title		= {Effects of Software Changes on Module Cohesion},
      pages		= {345-353},
      booktitle	= {Proceedings of the  International Conference on Software
    		  Maintenance ~1992},
      year		= {1992},
      publisher	= {IEEE Computer Society Press},
      month		= nov,
      abstract	= {We use program slices to model module cohesion. For our
    		  purpose, a slice is a projection of program text that
    		  includes only the data tokens relevant to one output. We
    		  define six cohesion metrics in terms of these slices, and
    		  evaluate the effects of classes of module changes on these
    		  metrics. We find that the effects on cohesion metrics are
    		  notably more predictable when the changes result from
    		  adding code rather than from moving code. In general, the
    		  effects that software changes have on the cohesion metrics
    		  match our intuition.},
      class		= {Software_Reverse_Engineering, Reverse_Design,
    		  Metric-Based_Methods_in_Reverse_Design, Metrics,
    		  Module_Cohesion}
    }
    
    
    The Relationship Between Slices and Module Cohesion, Linda M. Ott and J. J. Thuss
    @InProceedings{	  ott.thuss:relationship,
      author	= {Linda M. Ott and J. J. Thuss},
      title		= {The Relationship Between Slices and Module Cohesion},
      booktitle	= {Proceedings of the 11th  International Conference on
    		  Software Engineering },
      pages		= {198--204},
      month		= may,
      year		= {1989},
      abstract	= {The authors examine the relationship between the data flow
    		  in a module and its level of cohesion using a processing
    		  element flow graph (PFG). Based on these PFGs, they regroup
    		  the original seven levels of cohesion into four
    		  classifications. Slice profiles are then defined by
    		  generating slices for all output variables of a module. A
    		  relationship is then shown between these slice profiles and
    		  the PFG used to indicate levels of cohesion. It is
    		  suggested that these slice profiles can be used to
    		  determine more easily the cohesiveness of a module.},
      class		= {Software_Reverse_Engineering, Reverse_Design,
    		  Metric-Based_Methods_in_Reverse_Design, Metrics,
    		  Module_Cohesion}
    }
    
    
    A Measure for Composite Module Cohesion, Sukesh Patel and William C. Chu and R. Baxter
    @InProceedings{	  patel.chu.ea:measure,
      author	= {Sukesh Patel and William C. Chu and R. Baxter},
      title		= {A Measure for Composite Module Cohesion},
      booktitle	= {Proceedings of the 14th  International Conference on
    		  Software Engineering },
      pages		= {38--48},
      month		= may,
      year		= {1992},
      abstract	= {An important software design activity is the decomposition
    		  of complex systems into conceptually independent modules
    		  that cooperate to achieve a desired result. This
    		  modularization represents a significant software
    		  engineering activity that continues to receive considerable
    		  research attention. The authors illustrate how software may
    		  be modularized by automatically determining the
    		  cohesiveness of modules in the system. Module cohesion is
    		  defined to be a quality attribute that seeks to measure the
    		  singleness of purpose of a module. They propose a metric
    		  that measures the cohesion of individual subprograms of a
    		  software system as related to each other. This metric is
    		  illustrated with detailed examples and is supported with
    		  empirical evidence supporting the viability of the
    		  measure.},
      class		= {Software_Reverse_Engineering, Reverse_Design,
    		  Metric-Based_Methods_in_Reverse_Design, Metrics,
    		  Module_Cohesion}
    }
    

koschke@informatik.uni-stuttgart.de (Feedback).
Copyright © 1998-2000 University of Stuttgart, Germany. $Revision: 1.5 $
Date: Sat Nov 21 23:19:23 CET 2009